Your data. Your choice.

If you select «Essential cookies only», we’ll use cookies and similar technologies to collect information about your device and how you use our website. We need this information to allow you to log in securely and use basic functions such as the shopping cart.

By accepting all cookies, you’re allowing us to use this data to show you personalised offers, improve our website, and display targeted adverts on our website and on other websites or apps. Some data may also be shared with third parties and advertising partners as part of this process.

AOC U2879vf (3840 x 2160 Pixels, 28")

AOC U2879vf

3840 x 2160 Pixels, 28"


Questions about AOC U2879vf

What would you like to know?

Avatar

0 questions and answers

avatar
BioChe

5 years ago

avatar
mscher1977

5 years ago • purchased this product

purchased this product
https://helpcenter.digitec.ch/hc... and at the bottom is the link to the request for private customers. Try it once at Digitec. Otherwise search via the Gockel, i.e. this search engine: ADPC2065 20V 3.25A... There are a few. The correct plug to the monitor would be important, as other manufacturers also use such power supplies. Good luck
avatar
waverace

5 years ago

avatar
Mappo2009

5 years ago • purchased this product

purchased this product
Helpful answer
Yes, you can. On the Mac, the AOC is recognised correctly. However, the Mac Mini (in my case under macOS Mojave) cannot generate the maximum monitor resolution of 3840x2160. It stops at 2460x1440 - even with a special Mini Displayport to Displayport cable. With an HDMI cable, experience shows that the resolution should be even lower - but I haven't tried that. I therefore use the AOC on the PC, where it performs well. Since 2017, the Mac mini has been running the LG 34UB88-B (34", 3440 x 1440 pixels), with which I am very satisfied. Perhaps because LG produces screens for the iMacs, the Mac mini manages the full resolution of the LG 34UB88-B.
avatar
nuclearcity

7 years ago

avatar
Zeitphantom

7 years ago • purchased this product

purchased this product
Helpful answer
hello freebone so with the base 46.5 cm high, when the base is against the wall, the display with frame is 11.5 cm away from the front edge and the monitor itself is 66 cm wide. the base itself is 35 cm wide, 15.5 cm deep and 1 cm high. i have my BT-Bamster from Teufel on it, for example, and it fits perfectly. i hope this has helped you. Greetings
avatar
Andi_v_N

7 years ago

avatar
osaliven

7 years ago

Helpful answer
Yes, that's enough. At least as long as you need the monitor for light tasks like office or YouTube. But you won't be able to do gaming, photo or video editing and similar hardware-intensive applications with the 520. It is best to connect the monitor via Displayport and not via HDMI. That way you also have the full 60hz.
avatar
Former user

8 years ago

Is the supplied Hdmi cable 2.0?

avatar
Former user

8 years ago

And what version do the hdmi jacks have? (Also 2.0?)
avatar
esiemoen

8 years ago

avatar
CysteK

8 years ago

Hello Esiemoen Yes according to the specification here: Second Screen and Sync Screens modes: Simultaneously support full native resolution on the integrated display and up to 2560 x 1600 pixels resolution on up to two external displays, both with several million colours. You probably just can't use the maximum resolution of the monitor. Got it from here: https://support.apple.com/kb... This should be your model... Greetings CysteK
avatar
Former user

9 years ago

avatar
Sk0rpi0n

9 years ago

Helpful answer
Without really answering your question, I would advise you from experience to buy a 2k (1440p) monitor. All 4k monitors have only 60hz, the 2k monitors have up to 165hz. Above all, gaming in 4k has not yet reached a point where it is worth buying a 4k monitor.

20 of 20 questions

To Top